Trusted News Discovery Since 2008
{{/content}}
Why apex court struck down part of President order
Credit: IndiaTimes- Published on December 12, 2023
The Supreme Court upheld the Centre's decision to scrap J&K's special status under Article 370 but struck down a portion of the presidential Constitutional Order that amended Article 367. The court stated that allowing amendments in a circuitous manner would be disastrous and evade the constitutional procedure. The court...
Video credit: Wibbitz Top Stories
Published on December 11, 2023 - 01:30
Conversion Therapy Ban Stands in Washington State
Conversion Therapy Ban , Stands in Washington State.
On Dec. 11, the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge
to the state's ban concerning minors, NPR reports. .
The court's inaction upheld a lower court's
ruling banning conversion therapy in Washington. .
The court's inaction upheld a lower court's
ruling banning conversion therapy in Washington. .
The law, which went into effect in 2018, grants
Washington the ability to revoke therapists' licenses if
they attempt to alter the sexual orientation of a minor.
Conversion therapy advocate Brian Tingley
challenged the law with the help of the
"anti-LGBTQ Alliance Defending Freedom," NPR reports. .
Tingley says that the anti-conversion therapy
law violates his right to free speech. .
Tingley says that the anti-conversion therapy
law violates his right to free speech. .
While the Supreme Court
declined to hear Tingley's challenge, .
Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh
and Clarence Thomas dissented and
would have liked to hear the case. .
Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh
and Clarence Thomas dissented and
would have liked to hear the case. .
Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh
and Clarence Thomas dissented and
would have liked to hear the case. .
Although the court declines to
take this particular case, I have
no doubt that the issue it presents
will come before the court again. , Justice Clarence Thomas, via dissent.
When it does, the court should do what
it should have done here... to consider
what the First Amendment requires, Justice Clarence Thomas, via dissent
You are here
Related videos from verified sources
Jamie Raskin Says The Quiet Part Out Loud โฆ Democrats Really Want To Destroy The Supreme Court 00:56
Credit: Rumble - Published on December 31, 2023
UKโs Highest Court Rules Against Registering AI Systems As Patent โInventorsโ 01:31
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Published on December 21, 2023
Colorado's Highest Court Disqualifies Donald Trump From 2024 Primary Ballot 01:31
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Published on December 20, 2023
Related news from verified sources
The Supreme Court on Monday upheld government's order on abrogation of Article 370. The court delivered a unanimous verdict on petitions challenging the validity...
on December 11, 2023 • IndiaTimes
A court in El Salvador has ordered the arrest of former president Alfredo Cristiani for an alleged cover-up related to a civil war-era massacre of about 1,000...
on December 24, 2023 • IndiaTimes