Supreme Court Rules Against SEC's Authority to Impose Fines

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories
Published 3 days ago - Duration: 01:31s

Supreme Court Rules Against SEC's Authority to Impose Fines

Supreme Court Rules , Against SEC's Authority, to Impose Fines.

NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct.

.

NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct.

.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial.

.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial.

.

The SEC relies on administrative law judges (ALJ) to make legal conclusions in cases brought before the agency.

The Supreme Court's decision has the potential to send ripples through dozens of agencies, from labor rights to energy regulation.

The Court did exclude from its decision those agencies dealing with federal benefits, while some conservative justices wanted the ruling to go further.

The three liberal justices in dissent blasted the decision by the majority.

.

The case was brought by a former conservative radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, following an SEC fraud investigation.

The case was brought by a former conservative radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, following an SEC fraud investigation.

An in-house evidentiary hearing fined Jarkesy $300,000, ordered him to pay back almost $700,000 in ill-gotten profits and barred him from the securities industry.

Jarkesy argued that he was entitled to a jury trial held in a federal court and that Congress lacked the power to delegate such authority to the SEC.

NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk.

NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk


You are here


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Government agency overseeing stock changes



Supreme Court of the United States

Highest court of jurisdiction in the US
The US Supreme Court has ruled that emergency abortions in Idaho can go ahead.
Credit: Sky News - Published 3 days ago

The Supreme Court of India marks its 75th year with a historic six-day Special Lok Adalat from June 29, aiming to resolve 10,000 cases free of cost. Led by Chief..
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 3 days ago


Authority

Legitimate power to decide or authorize


Administrative law judge

Judge and trier of fact

United States Congress

Legislative branch of U.S. government
Prime Minister Modi hinted at Congress's strategic tactic by reinstating Sam Pitroda after his resignation, creating confusion and forcing opponents to react...
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 3 days ago

The Lok Sabha resolution against the 1975 Emergency highlighted the suffering of the poor and oppressed, condemning the dictatorship of Congress. Speaker Om..
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 4 days ago

The new session of the Lok Sabha started with an intriguing development as the Congress faced isolation when the newly-elected Speaker initiated a motion to..
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 4 days ago

You might like