Supreme Court Stays Allahabad High Court Order Related To Mathura Shahi Eidgah Mosque Survey

Credit: Zee News- Published on January 16, 2024
The court criticized the High Court's decision, stating that it acted on a vague application seeking broad directions, emphasizing the need for specificity in such matters.

Video credit: Wibbitz Top Stories
Published on January 17, 2024 -  01:31
Supreme Court Could Overturn Decades-Old Precedent to Weaken Federal Agencies
Supreme Court Could , Overturn Decades-Old Precedent , to Weaken Federal Agencies. On January 17, the United States Supreme Court will consider overturning a 40-year-old precedent that has widely been opposed by Conservatives. . On January 17, the United States Supreme Court will consider overturning a 40-year-old precedent that has widely been opposed by Conservatives. . NBC reports that the 1984 ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council has long been a point of contention for the right. . NBC reports that the 1984 ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council has long been a point of contention for the right. . Among Conservatives, the unpopular precedent is seen to bolster the power of federal agencies. . The 6-3 Conservative-led Supreme Court will hear oral arguments from two related cases involving regulation regarding fisheries. . The 6-3 Conservative-led Supreme Court will hear oral arguments from two related cases involving regulation regarding fisheries. . The Chevron decision initially came as a win for the Reagan administration's deregulatory efforts, requiring judges to defer to federal agencies to interpret ambiguous laws. The precedent later allowed the Environmental Protection Agency to enact Clean Air Act regulations that favored polluting facilities. . NBC reports that the precedent has been used by both Democratic and Republican presidents over decades to take advantage of the authority it grants federal agencies. NBC reports that the precedent has been used by both Democratic and Republican presidents over decades to take advantage of the authority it grants federal agencies. Environmental groups have argued that the precedent should remain in place so federal agencies can help handle major areas of concern, including climate change. Environmental groups have argued that the precedent should remain in place so federal agencies can help handle major areas of concern, including climate change. According to Jonathan Adler, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, there have always been disagreements regarding how the Chevron ruling should be applied. This has been bubbling around for a while, but certainly on the right there is a concern that ... agencies are not so much faithfully executing Congress' instructions as they are trying to figure out ways of doing what they want to do, Jonathan Adler, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, via statement

You are here


Related videos from verified sources

Chinaโ€™s Evergrande Is Ordered to Liquidate 01:31
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Published on January 29, 2024 


Border Agents Can Remove Razor Wire in Texas, Supreme Court Rules 01:30
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Published on January 23, 2024 


Supreme Court Rejects Chance to Step Into the Fight Over Transgender Student Rights 01:31
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Published on January 16, 2024 


Related news from verified sources

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Allahabad High Court order rejecting a PIL seeking recognition of Mathura's Shahi Idgah Mosque site as Krishna...
on January 5, 2024 • IndiaTimes

The Intezamia Committee for Shahi Idgah in Mathura welcomed the SC's decision to extend the stay on the high court order for a survey of the mosque. The...
on January 30, 2024 • IndiaTimes

Supreme Court extends stay on Commission for Shahi Eidgah Mosque in Gyanvapi case. Hearing adjourned until April. Hindu plaintiff urges court to revoke order on...
on January 29, 2024 • IndiaTimes

You might like