The two judges on the bench took contrasting stands on interpretation of Section 17A of the Prevention of the Corruption Act which talks about taking sanction..

In R. (on the application of Piffs Elm Ltd) v Commission for Local Administration in England [2023] EWCA Civ 486, the Court of Appeal considered the withdrawal..

The PMO told the Delhi HC that the PM Cares Fund is not a “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution and does not constitute a “public authority” under..

The affidavit stated that the plea is based on "apprehensions and suppositions" and that a constitutional question should not be decided in a vacuum.

Giving false or misleading information in NSW is a criminal offence which carries a maximum penalty of 2 years in prison.

PM-CARES fund can neither be brought under the ambit of Right to Information (RTI) Act as a public authority nor can it be listed as a State.

Section 8(1)(h) of the RIT Act allows a public authority to withhold information, the disclosure of which would impede the process of an investigation or the..

The Centre has said that no public authority can refuse any service for not having the app

The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) Wednesday raised objection in the Delhi High Court over maintainability of a plea seeking to declare PM CARES Fund as a 'public..

The petition had said that PM CARES is a 'public authority' within the ambit of Section 2(h) of the RTI and prayed for a direction to the trust to display the..

The PIL said PM CARES is a 'public authority' within the ambit of Section 2(h) of the RTI and prayed for a direction to the trust to display the details of the..

It cites reports of PM CARES Fund refusing to divulge information, claiming it is not a ‘public authority’ within ambit of Section 2(h) of RTI Act, 2005

Fund is not public authority, says reply