Supreme Court Rules Against Religious Exclusion From Maine's Tuition Assistance Program

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories
Published on June 21, 2022 - Duration: 01:31s

Supreme Court Rules Against Religious Exclusion From Maine's Tuition Assistance Program

Supreme Court Rules Against , Religious Exclusion From Maine's , Tuition Assistance Program.

On June 21, the Supreme Court ruled that religious schools in Maine cannot be excluded from the state's tuition assistance program.

.

CNN reports that the state program allows parents in Maine to use vouchers to enroll their children in public or private schools.

Maine’s ‘nonsectarian’ requirement for its otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, Chief Justice John Roberts, via CNN.

Maine’s ‘nonsectarian’ requirement for its otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, Chief Justice John Roberts, via CNN.

Regardless of how the benefit and restriction are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise, Chief Justice John Roberts, via CNN.

Regardless of how the benefit and restriction are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise, Chief Justice John Roberts, via CNN.

According to CNN, the ruling by the conservative court expands religious liberty rights and brings religion into public life.

Critics say the decision amounts to an erosion of the , separation of church and state.

Justice Stephen Breyer, who voted against the measure, wrote that the court had , “never previously held what the Court holds today, namely, that a State must (not may) use state funds to pay for religious education as part of a tuition program designed to ensure the provision of free statewide public school education.”.

Justice Stephen Breyer, who voted against the measure, wrote that the court had , “never previously held what the Court holds today, namely, that a State must (not may) use state funds to pay for religious education as part of a tuition program designed to ensure the provision of free statewide public school education.”.

In response, Justice John Roberts emphasized that , "the state pays for tuition for certain students at private schools – so long as they are not religious.”.

That is discrimination against religion, Chief Justice John Roberts, via CNN.

Justice Sotomayer, who also voted against the majority, accused the conservative court of dismantling , “the wall of separation between church and state that the Framers fought to build.”


You are here


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions


Supreme Court of the United States

Highest court of jurisdiction in the United States
The Supreme Court has put on hold the imprisonment of Congress MLA Mohammed Moquim in a corruption case. Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta have asked the..
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 21 hours ago

Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Ramdev, said that an apology has been published in newspapers. But the Supreme Court reprimanded him on why the apology was..
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 1 day ago

Utilizing its authority granted by Article 142 of the Constitution, on Monday, the Supreme Court authorized the termination of a 14-year-old girl's 30-week-old..
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 1 day ago

Attorney general R Venkataramani, representing the Centre apprised the court that the Election Commission has allowed the Union government to deal with the issue..
Credit: IndiaTimes - Published 2 days ago

Related videos from verified sources

Sonia Sotomayor Accuses Conservatives of ‘Dismantling’ Separation of Church and State 01:31
Video credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Published on June 21, 2022 

You might like