This story is from January 17, 2024

Judge's uncalled for remarks against trans people draw high court fire

Bombay HC criticizes sessions court judge's order for making "uncalled for" observations against trans persons. HC judge states that transgenders are citizens of this country and are protected under the right to life and liberty. The sessions court's order, which made generalizing and stereotypical remarks about transgenders, should not have been recorded. "Transgenders are getting bolder by the day, and rowdier and nastier. Safety of the public is at high risk at every public place because of transgenders. Therefore, fear or hatred for transgenders is not without a reason, for men it is worst (sic)," session court said.
Judge's uncalled for remarks against trans people draw high court fire
Image used for representative purpose only
MUMBAI: Bombay HC on Monday censured a sessions court judge's order for making "uncalled for" observations against trans persons. While granting bail to a transgender person accused of harassing and abusing a devotee at Shri Vitthal Rukmini Mandir in Pandharpur, HC judge Madhav Jamdar said "transgenders are citizens of this country" and are protected under the right to life and liberty like all other citizens.
While denying bail, the sessions court had said, "It is well known that transgenders harass people, demanding money at public places, public functions, marriages, funerals and inaugurations.
People walking on any street cannot escape confrontation with transgenders. Transgenders are getting bolder by the day, and rowdier and nastier. Safety of the public is at high risk at every public place because of transgenders. Therefore, fear or hatred for transgenders is not without a reason, for men it is worst (sic)." HC said the sessions court should not have in its order recorded this as it was neither required nor relevant to deciding the bail plea.
Additional sessions judge M B Lambe in the December 19, 2023, bail rejection order had also said, "The time has come when it is necessary to facilitate an investigation into such offences and courts should not ignore this aspect while considering the question of liberty of the accused". He observed that such trans persons' "rowdier and nastier acts" would affect devotees visiting the pilgrim town.
Justice Jamdar said "such stereotypical and generalising observations" on trans persons' behaviour was "uncalled for". "Article 21 of the Constitution protects the right to life and personal liberty of all citizens. The right to life includes the right to live with dignity. Therefore, the observations should not have been recorded," he noted.
author
About the Author
Swati Deshpande

Swati Deshpande is Senior editor at The Times of India, Mumbai, where she has been covering courts for over a decade. She is passionate about law and works towards enlightening people about their statutory, legal and fundamental rights. She makes it her job to decipher for the public the truth, be it in an intricate civil dispute or in a gruesome criminal case.

End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA